Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
What's Hot

With new app store, Ring bets on AI to go beyond home security

March 31, 2026

Student loan borrowers have deadline to exit SAVE repayment plan

March 31, 2026

5 things to know before markets open on Tuesday

March 31, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
WhistleBuzz – Smart News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
WhistleBuzz – Smart News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends
Home » Chelsea 1-1 Arsenal: Should Trevo Chalobá’s opening goal be canceled because Enzo Fernandes was in an offside position? | Soccer News
Sports

Chelsea 1-1 Arsenal: Should Trevo Chalobá’s opening goal be canceled because Enzo Fernandes was in an offside position? | Soccer News

Editor-In-ChiefBy Editor-In-ChiefDecember 1, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Chelsea’s draw with Arsenal was filled with refereeing controversy, but should the Blues’ opener be canceled due to another subjective offside in the Premier League?

Trevo Chalobah put 10-man Chelsea ahead in the second half by flicking in Reece James’ corner-kick – but did Enzo Fernandes play a big role in the ball coming in from an offside position?

Chelsea’s number eight was ahead of the play when Charova flicked the ball on, and although Fernandes did not touch the ball, he appeared to be affecting Cristian Mosquera’s ability to clear the ball off his line.

image:
Fernandes was in an offside position when Charova flicked the ball

image:
Fernandes played a big role in Cristian Mosquera’s ability to clear the ball off the line.

Under the rules of the IFAB (International Football Association Board), the law makers of the game, a player can be found offside if:

Preventing an opponent from playing the ball, challenging an opponent for the ball, or taking any obvious action that clearly affects an opponent’s ability to play the ball.

Fernandes’ actions call into question all three of these criteria. Sky Sports News has contacted PGMOL for comment.

monterosa

This content is provided by monterosacookies and other technologies may be used. To view this content, you must allow cookies. You can change the settings and enable it using the buttons below. monterosa Use cookies or allow them only once. You can change your settings at any time in Privacy Options.


Unfortunately, we were unable to verify whether you consented. monterosa cookie. To view this content please allow using the button below monterosa Cookie for this session only.

Enable cookies Allow cookies only once

Mosquera’s right hand is technically equivalent to Fernandes’, but in soccer you cannot gain an advantage by using your hands, and the rules of the game state that the hands and arms of all players, including the goalkeeper, are not considered offside.

image:
Mosquera’s hands are in line with Fernandes’s, but his hands and arms are not included in the offside ruling.

Instead, offside is determined at the sleeve line. And Fernandez appears to be ahead of Mosquera.

image:
The arm is not used when offside and the referee checks the arm from the sleeve line – as in the Newcastle vs Man City example.

The incident follows a string of subjective offside decisions in the Premier League. Virgil van Dijk’s goal for Liverpool against Man City was ruled out after Andy Robertson was adjudged to have influenced the play from an offside position without touching the ball.

And two weeks later, Murillo’s goal against Liverpool against Nottingham Forest was disallowed by VAR despite Dan Ndoye being in an offside position. The goal was allowed because it was determined that Ndoye was not in front of Alisson.

Use Chrome Browser for a more accessible video player



Virgil van Dijk’s goal against Manchester City was ruled out for offside in front of the keeper, but Murillo’s goal against Nottingham Forest was ruled out!

So did the officials miss an important decision that could affect this season’s title race?



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor-In-Chief
  • Website

Related Posts

2026 World Cup: Who has qualified? Full list of teams for the tournament in the US, Canada and Mexico | Soccer News

March 31, 2026

Caroline Dubois and Ellie Scotney have a big fight this Sunday, but the future looks bright for British boxing | Boxing News

March 31, 2026

Newcastle’s David Hopkinson talks about Eddie Howe’s future, Sandro Tonali transfer speculation and club record income | Soccer News

March 31, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

News

US President Trump says he is “interested” in asking Arab countries to pay for war against Iran | US and Israel’s war against Iran News

By Editor-In-ChiefMarch 30, 2026

White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said it was Trump’s “idea” to shift the costs…

Rubio denies US punitive action, blames Cuba for economic collapse | Donald Trump News

March 30, 2026

ICE announces death of another Mexican detainee in U.S. immigration custody | Migration News

March 30, 2026
Top Trending

With new app store, Ring bets on AI to go beyond home security

By Editor-In-ChiefMarch 31, 2026

With more than 100 million cameras currently in the field, Amazon-owned Ring…

Popular AI gateway startup LiteLLM exits controversial startup Delve

By Editor-In-ChiefMarch 30, 2026

LiteLLM, the maker of the popular AI gateway used by millions of…

15% of Americans say they would like to work for an AI boss, according to the latest poll

By Editor-In-ChiefMarch 30, 2026

Would you replace your manager with a chatbot? More Americans are saying…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Welcome to WhistleBuzz.com (“we,” “our,” or “us”). Your privacy is important to us. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, disclose, and safeguard your information when you visit our website https://whistlebuzz.com/ (the “Site”). Please read this policy carefully to understand our views and practices regarding your personal data and how we will treat it.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact US
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About US
© 2026 whistlebuzz. Designed by whistlebuzz.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.