Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
What's Hot

Tesla (TSLA) Vehicle production volume for Q2 2026

July 2, 2026

Pope’s July 4th visit to migrant hotspots sends a veiled message to U.S. leaders

July 2, 2026

OpenAI proposed donating 5% of its stock to a US sovereign wealth fund

July 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Home » Music publisher sues Anthropic for $3 billion over ‘blatant copyright infringement’ of 20,000 works
AI

Music publisher sues Anthropic for $3 billion over ‘blatant copyright infringement’ of 20,000 works

Editor-In-ChiefBy Editor-In-ChiefJanuary 29, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


A group of music publishers led by Concord Music Group and Universal Music Group is suing Anthropic, alleging that the company illegally downloaded more than 20,000 copyrighted songs, including sheet music, lyrics and music.

Publishers said in a statement Wednesday that damages could exceed $3 billion, potentially making it the largest non-class action copyright lawsuit in U.S. history.

The lawsuit was brought by the same legal team as Barts v. Anthropic, in which a group of fiction and nonfiction authors alike accused AI companies of using copyrighted works to train products like Claude.

In that case, Judge William Alsup ruled that it was legal for Anthropic to use copyrighted content to train its models. However, he noted that it is illegal for Anthropic to obtain that content through copyright infringement.

The Bartz v. Anthropic lawsuit cost Anthropic $1.5 billion, with affected authors receiving approximately $3,000 per work for approximately 500,000 copyrighted works. $1.5 billion may seem like a lot, but for a company valued at $183 billion, it’s not.

These music publishers originally filed suit against Anthropic over the use of approximately 500 copyrighted works. But the publishers say they discovered through the discovery process in the Barts case that Anthropic had made thousands more illegal downloads.

The publisher attempted to amend the original lawsuit to address the copyright infringement issue, but the court rejected that motion in October, ruling that it had not previously investigated the copyright infringement claim. The move prompted the publisher to instead file this separate lawsuit, which also names Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and co-founder Benjamin Mann as defendants.

tech crunch event

boston, massachusetts
|
June 23, 2026

“Although Anthropic makes misleading claims to be an AI ‘safety and research’ company, its record of illegal torrents of copyrighted works reveals that its multibillion-dollar business empire has actually been built on piracy,” the complaint states.

Anthropic did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor-In-Chief
  • Website

Related Posts

OpenAI proposed donating 5% of its stock to a US sovereign wealth fund

July 2, 2026

Microsoft launches its own AI implementation company with $2.5 billion commitment

July 2, 2026

Yes, I am currently using OpenClaw

July 2, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

News

Why did President Trump refuse to renew USMCA and what does it mean? | Commentary News

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 2, 2026

The United States announced it would not renew the trilateral trade agreement covering $1.6 trillion…

U.S. judge sided with NAACP on mail-in voting restrictions | Election News

July 1, 2026

U.S. Supreme Court gives wealthy donors more influence in latest ruling | Explanatory News

July 1, 2026
Top Trending

OpenAI proposed donating 5% of its stock to a US sovereign wealth fund

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 2, 2026

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has proposed selling a 5% stake in the…

Microsoft launches its own AI implementation company with $2.5 billion commitment

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 2, 2026

On Thursday, Microsoft announced a new operating business called Microsoft Frontier Company…

Yes, I am currently using OpenClaw

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 2, 2026

Ben Guez “populates[his]DMs with potential international wives” thanks to automated scripts he…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Welcome to WhistleBuzz.com (“we,” “our,” or “us”). Your privacy is important to us. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, disclose, and safeguard your information when you visit our website https://whistlebuzz.com/ (the “Site”). Please read this policy carefully to understand our views and practices regarding your personal data and how we will treat it.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact US
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About US
© 2026 whistlebuzz. Designed by whistlebuzz.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.