Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
What's Hot

Jorgen Strand Larsen joins Crystal Palace: completes £48m move to Selhurst Park as Wolves striker Jean-Philippe Mateta stays | Soccer News

February 2, 2026

What Snowflake and OpenAI’s deal says about the enterprise AI race

February 2, 2026

Volatile movements in Bitcoin, silver, and memory stocks could spook the bull market

February 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
WhistleBuzz – Smart News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
WhistleBuzz – Smart News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends
Home » Liverpool’s goal against Man City canceled: Howard Webb says it’s ‘not unreasonable’ to rule out Virgil van Dijk’s header Soccer News
Sports

Liverpool’s goal against Man City canceled: Howard Webb says it’s ‘not unreasonable’ to rule out Virgil van Dijk’s header Soccer News

Editor-In-ChiefBy Editor-In-ChiefNovember 11, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


PGMOL referee Howard Webb said it was “not unreasonable” for Virgil van Dijk’s header to be ruled out in Liverpool’s 3-0 defeat to Manchester City.

Van Dijk’s first-half header was disallowed on-field for offside, with Andy Robertson penalized for interfering with goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma.

Referee Chris Kavanagh made the call on the field after the assistant referee raised the offside flag. After a video assistant referee (VAR) check, the goal was ruled out as Robertson was determined to have interfered with play from an offside position.

Law 11 – Offside

A player who was in an offside position at the moment the ball was played is penalized for interfering with an opponent only if:

Clearly obstructing an opponent’s view or preventing him from playing the ball.

Challenge your opponent for the ball,

When this action affects the opponent, there is clearly an attempt to play a close ball, or

Taking an obvious action that clearly affects an opponent’s ability to play the ball.

Liverpool head coach Arn Slott said it was “plain and obvious” that the decision was wrong before the club contacted PGMOL, but chair umpire Webb never said the decision was wrong during the match official’s microphone.

Webb said, “As the ball moved towards Robertson, in the middle of the six-yard box, three yards from goal, Robertson took a clear action by ducking under the ball. The ball passed just over his head and found the goal in his half of the six-yard box.”

“The referee has to make a decision, but did that specific action affect the goalkeeper and his ability to save the ball? That’s where the subjectivity comes in.

“They saw the action in close proximity to the goalkeeper and formed that opinion.

Use Chrome Browser for a more accessible video player


Highlights of the Premier League match between Manchester City and Liverpool.

Premier League match highlights between Manchester City and Liverpool

“I know that’s not a view held by everyone, but it’s not unreasonable to see why (the officials) would come to that conclusion when the player is so close to the goalkeeper, the ball is coming towards the goalkeeper, and he has to duck to avoid getting in the way.

“They have concluded that it will affect Donnarumma’s ability to dive for the ball and make saves.

“Once they make a decision on the field, VAR’s job is to look at it and decide whether the result was clearly and clearly wrong.

“Only Donnarumma will really know if he was affected by this, and we need to look at the factual evidence.”

Slott compared the decision to last season’s, when John Stones headed home the late winner against Wolves in Manchester City’s favor, despite Bernardo Silva standing in a similar position in front of goalkeeper Jose Sa.

“There’s a clear difference in that the ball goes directly over Sa’s head and not over Silva’s head. He’s in an offside position, but the important thing is that he stays away from the flight of the ball,” Webb said.

“Looking at this, it’s hard to see how Sa would be affected by Silva’s actions. If the ball had gone over Silva’s head, perhaps causing Sa to hesitate if it had hit Silva, we would have had the same result of the goal being disallowed.”

What officials said…

Assistant Referee: Robertson is in line of sight and directly in front of the keeper. He’s under the ball. He’s very, very close. I think he’s in sight. I think he (Donnarumma) is under the influence, mate.

Referee: Then it’s offside.

Assistant referee: I think it’s offside.

Referee: The on-field decision was offside.

VAR: Confirm on-field decision for offside against Andy Robertson. Delay, delay.

This means you have a clear offside position.

AVAR: I agree with the decision on the field. I think it’s offside. This is clearly an obvious move that affects the goalkeeper.

VAR: Chris, this is Michael. Confirmed on-field offside ruling against Andy Robertson. He is in an offside position very close to the goalkeeper and makes an obvious movement in front of him. Check completed, offside.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor-In-Chief
  • Website

Related Posts

Jorgen Strand Larsen joins Crystal Palace: completes £48m move to Selhurst Park as Wolves striker Jean-Philippe Mateta stays | Soccer News

February 2, 2026

Six Nations: Henry Arundel, George Ford and Alex Coles start, Maro Itoje reserved for England vs Wales | Rugby Union News

February 2, 2026

January 2026 transfer deadline day deals – transfers confirmed in Premier League, EFL, Scottish Premiership and across Europe | Soccer News

February 2, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

News

President Trump lowers US tariffs on India from 50% to 18% | Trade war news

By Editor-In-ChiefFebruary 2, 2026

President Trump imposed a 25% punitive tariff on India on purchases of Russian crude oil,…

Has the Trump administration gone too far with spin? |Donald Trump

February 2, 2026

Trump and Petro clash over best way to eradicate Colombia’s cocaine crop | Donald Trump News

February 2, 2026
Top Trending

What Snowflake and OpenAI’s deal says about the enterprise AI race

By Editor-In-ChiefFebruary 2, 2026

Cloud data company Snowflake signed a $200 million multi-year AI contract with…

Coalition calls on federal government to ban Grok over non-consensual sexual content

By Editor-In-ChiefFebruary 2, 2026

A coalition of nonprofit organizations is calling on the U.S. government to…

Carbon Robotics built an AI model to detect and identify plants

By Editor-In-ChiefFebruary 2, 2026

It is up to the farmer’s eye to determine which weeds need…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Welcome to WhistleBuzz.com (“we,” “our,” or “us”). Your privacy is important to us. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, disclose, and safeguard your information when you visit our website https://whistlebuzz.com/ (the “Site”). Please read this policy carefully to understand our views and practices regarding your personal data and how we will treat it.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact US
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About US
© 2026 whistlebuzz. Designed by whistlebuzz.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.