Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
What's Hot

Like SpaceX, Meta is looking to convert surplus AI computing into cash

July 1, 2026

CNBC Daily Open: Oil suffers biggest monthly decline while AI demand fuels investors’ portfolios

July 1, 2026

PlayStation will end production of physical discs for new games in 2028

July 1, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Home » Katy Perry vs. Katy Perry: Australian designer wins trademark rights from pop star
International

Katy Perry vs. Katy Perry: Australian designer wins trademark rights from pop star

Editor-In-ChiefBy Editor-In-ChiefMarch 12, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


sydney
—

Sydney-based fashion designer Katy Perry always dreamed of starting her own clothing brand. She never imagined that being a global pop star would become her biggest obstacle.

But on Wednesday, Australia’s Supreme Court ruled that Perry, who now goes by her married name Katy Taylor, had the right to sell clothing under her own name.

This is a big win for the underdog small business owner who received a letter from another Katy Perry more than 15 years ago.

“Imagine this: I had just launched my first showroom,” she told CNN, recalling the moment in 2009, two years after launching Katy Perry, a fashion line selling colorful and comfortable basics.

“When I got back to the showroom, there were empty champagne glasses everywhere, and I opened the mailbox. All I remember is seeing a piece of paper that said discontinued. Stop selling the clothes, discontinue the website, discontinue the advertising material.”

American singer Perry, born Katherine Elizabeth Hudson, rapidly rose to international fame in 2008 after the release of her popular singles “I Kissed a Girl” and “Hot and Cold,” which topped the Australian and international charts.

Ahead of Perry’s first Australian tour in 2009, her lawyer sent a letter to Taylor requesting that she withdraw the trademark application she had filed months earlier.

“I remember starting to cry and thinking, what the heck is this? I didn’t do anything wrong,” Taylor said.

The letter started a multi-court legal battle that lasted nearly 20 years, but on Wednesday Australia’s High Court ruled that a designer’s use of his name on a clothing brand did not violate trademark law.

“Honestly, it feels like a dream,” Taylor told CNN after reading the verdict. “I always think, oh my god, did this actually happen?”

“Katy Perry has never attempted to shut down Ms. Taylor’s business or stop selling clothing under the KATIE PERRY brand,” a representative for Perry wrote in an email.

The case revolved around who was legally allowed to sell clothing under the Katy or Katy Perry names.

According to Wednesday’s court filing, Taylor said she first heard Perry in July 2008 when “I Kissed a Girl” came on the radio.

Taylor said, “I wanted to support an artist with the same name as me, so I bought this song on iTunes.”

However, their matching names would soon drive a wedge between them.

After the 2009 letter, the two sides attempted to reach a settlement but were unable to agree on terms, according to court filings.

According to the court’s ruling, Taylor was granted the clothing trademark, while Perry amended his application to only include music and entertainment.

The legal battle faded into the background. However, as Perry’s star grew and he continued to tour around the world, including Australia, he began offering his fans branded tour merchandise, including clothing.

In 2019, Taylor sued Perry, claiming that Perry infringed on her trademark.

Taylor won in the Federal Court, but lost on appeal, with judges finding that Perry’s reputation in Australia was stronger than Taylor’s at the time Taylor registered her trademark application, and that it was common for pop stars to sell products.

In a strong condemnation of Taylor’s lawsuit, they argued that her “Katy Perry” trademark should be canceled.

But on Wednesday, Australia’s High Court overturned that decision, arguing that the cancellation of the trademark was not justified and that use of the Katy Perry trademark was unlikely to cause deception or confusion.

Taylor said the legal battle was a long and difficult process, but he did it to show that trademarks exist to protect small businesses, not just big brands.

“So many people have said to me, ‘Why don’t you just quit? It’s not worth it. I truly believe in standing up for your values. Truth and justice are part of my core and my values.’

Mr Taylor said he was now “back in business” selling clothes at a market in Sydney.

“But this never crossed my mind, and it really hasn’t since 2009. I just feel heavy and there’s a lot of fear and I’m at a loss,” she said.

“Now I can really look forward and focus on the future. I’m really excited.”



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor-In-Chief
  • Website

Related Posts

At least 5 people killed, many injured in fire at Belgian apartment complex

July 1, 2026

Vadim Ermolaev: Who is the Ukrainian businessman targeted in the bombing?

July 1, 2026

At least 14 children killed after roof collapses at tutoring center in eastern Pakistan, police say

July 1, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

News

Colorado primary election results: Melat Quiroz wins – Key points | Election news

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 1, 2026

Anti-establishment progressives on Tuesday passed on some veteran lawmakers in the Democratic primary in Colorado,…

US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship: Who wins and who loses? |Immigration news

July 1, 2026

What is birthright citizenship? What does the Supreme Court ruling say? | Court News

June 30, 2026
Top Trending

Like SpaceX, Meta is looking to convert surplus AI computing into cash

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 1, 2026

Meta has spent billions of dollars developing AI and building data centers…

Disrupt 2026 Builders Stage Agenda Revealed

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 1, 2026

TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 will once again feature the Builders Stage, bringing together…

Gemini Spark, Google’s agent assistant, is now available on Mac

By Editor-In-ChiefJuly 1, 2026

Gemini Spark, Google’s AI agent that helps you with aspects of your…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Welcome to WhistleBuzz.com (“we,” “our,” or “us”). Your privacy is important to us. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, disclose, and safeguard your information when you visit our website https://whistlebuzz.com/ (the “Site”). Please read this policy carefully to understand our views and practices regarding your personal data and how we will treat it.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact US
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About US
© 2026 whistlebuzz. Designed by whistlebuzz.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.