Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
What's Hot

How is the framework agreement with Lebanon viewed in Israel? |US-Israel war against Iran News

June 27, 2026

“Heated rivalry” and the boom in gay romance stories

June 27, 2026

AI trade has cooled and oil has fallen. A closer look at a volatile week on Wall Street

June 27, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Home » Supreme Court clears path for Alabama Republicans to pursue new voting map
Politics

Supreme Court clears path for Alabama Republicans to pursue new voting map

Editor-In-ChiefBy Editor-In-ChiefMay 11, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Monday, April 20, 2026, at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC.

Graham Sloan | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for Alabama Republicans to pursue a more favorable congressional voting map for their party ahead of November’s midterm elections, the latest fallout from the court’s landmark ruling on voting rights.

The justices struck down a lower court ruling that blocked the state Republican Party’s preferred map as racist and illegally diluted the voting power of black Alabamians.

The politically conservative southern state is expected to aim to revert to its previous map, which reduced the number of the state’s seven U.S. House districts with a majority or near-majority black voters from two to one. Using the previous map could be an advantage for Republicans.

The order was pushed by the court’s nine-member conservative majority. Three liberal justices dissented and suggested that lower courts could reapply judicial injunctions against maps favored by Alabama Republicans.

President Donald Trump’s fellow Republicans are fighting to maintain control of the House of Representatives as well as the Senate in the midterm elections.

Alabama is one of several Republican-led states seeking to eliminate majority-black congressional districts to boost the party’s chances ahead of the election following a Supreme Court ruling striking down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. Black voters tend to support Democratic candidates.

In a landmark April 29 ruling, the court, in a 6-3 decision supported by conservative lawmakers, struck down the electoral map that had given Louisiana a majority-black second U.S. Congressional District. The majority determined that the redrawn map relied too heavily on race and violated the Constitution’s equal protection principle.

In response to the Supreme Court’s ruling, Alabama immediately filed an emergency motion asking a judge to allow the state to revert to its old map, which had just one majority-black district.

Alabama, where black voters make up a quarter of the state’s electoral districts, had been ordered by a lower court to use a map that included two of its seven majority-black districts. Both are held by Black Democrats.

Lower courts ruled that previous maps intentionally discriminated against black voters and illegally weakened their voting power.

Alabama officials argued in a Supreme Court filing that Alabama’s court-ordered maps have the same constitutional flaws as Louisiana’s.

In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor emphasized that the lower court’s decision regarding the Alabama map is broader than the Louisiana case, including a finding of unconstitutional discrimination by intentionally diluting the votes of black voters in Alabama.

The majority’s decision to overturn the lower court’s ruling is therefore “inappropriate and will only cause confusion as Alabama begins voting in elections scheduled for next week,” Sotomayor wrote in a dissent joined by two of his fellow liberal justices.

He referred to the court’s April 29 decision, called Louisiana v. Calais, which said lower courts “remain free to decide for themselves on remand whether Calais has any bearing on the Fourteenth Amendment analysis or whether prior reasoning is unaffected by that decision.”

The court had upheld a lower court’s ruling in 2023 that the state’s Republican-drawn electoral maps undermined the power of Black voters and violated the Voting Rights Act. The 5-4 decision was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by fellow conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the court’s three liberal justices.

In a process called redistricting, the boundaries of Congressional districts across the United States are reconfigured to reflect population changes as measured by the decennial census. Redistricting has typically been done by state legislatures once every 10 years.

Republicans and Democrats are engaged in a multi-state redistricting battle, sparked last year by President Trump’s unprecedented mid-decade effort to redraw maps in Republican-led states, starting with Texas.

Never miss the most trusted news moments in business news when you choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor-In-Chief
  • Website

Related Posts

President Trump: Iran violates ceasefire with drone attack in Strait of Hormuz

June 26, 2026

President Trump threatens countries with 100% tariffs on digital services tax

June 26, 2026

Israel and Lebanon agree on framework and ceasefire

June 26, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

News

How is the framework agreement with Lebanon viewed in Israel? |US-Israel war against Iran News

By Editor-In-ChiefJune 27, 2026

The announcement of a framework agreement between Israel and Lebanon following negotiations in the United…

US-Iran trade strike: What you need to know, will the memorandum unravel? |US-Israel war against Iran News

June 27, 2026

Could the upcoming Israeli elections spell the end of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s political career? |Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu News

June 27, 2026
Top Trending

The most suitable founder in this room turned out to be cancer. Here’s how he used AI to fight back.

By Editor-In-ChiefJune 27, 2026

Kono Christo does not leave things to chance. He tracks his sleep…

Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models as Anthropic export ban drags on

By Editor-In-ChiefJune 27, 2026

On Wednesday, Chinese cybersecurity company 360 reportedly announced Tulongfeng, an AI tool…

Trump administration reveals human myths used by more than 100 US companies and agencies

By Editor-In-ChiefJune 26, 2026

Two weeks after the ban that caused Anthropic to pull its powerful…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Welcome to WhistleBuzz.com (“we,” “our,” or “us”). Your privacy is important to us. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, disclose, and safeguard your information when you visit our website https://whistlebuzz.com/ (the “Site”). Please read this policy carefully to understand our views and practices regarding your personal data and how we will treat it.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact US
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About US
© 2026 whistlebuzz. Designed by whistlebuzz.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.