Close Menu
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
What's Hot

Kramer says this is the stock to buy as data center development slows

November 9, 2026

Medium’s new TK app brings AI assistance directly into the writing process

November 9, 2026

Honda to invest $3 billion in new vehicle assembly plant in Ohio

November 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • AI
  • Art & Style
  • Economy
  • Entertainment
  • International
  • Market
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Trump
  • US
  • World
Smart Breaking News on AI, Business, Politics & Global Trends | WhistleBuzz
Home » Bill Cassidy signs brief calling ‘weaponized’ funds a ‘grave threat’
Politics

Bill Cassidy signs brief calling ‘weaponized’ funds a ‘grave threat’

Editor-In-ChiefBy Editor-In-ChiefJune 4, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) speaks at the CNBC CEO Council Summit in Washington, DC on June 2, 2026.

Aaron Clammage | CNBC

Louisiana Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy signed a court brief calling President Donald Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund a “grave threat” to Congress and constitutional order.

The court brief by Mr. Cassidy and Sen. Cory Booker (D.N.J.) was filed Wednesday in a lawsuit challenging the fund that is pending in a Virginia court. Cassidy lost a runoff in Louisiana last month amid a pro-Trump primary, but Congress is considering amendments to the budget reconciliation bill that could eliminate the “legislative” fund entirely.

Mr. Cassidy’s inclusion in the brief reflects widespread opposition to the fund by Senate Republicans, who rarely oppose Mr. Trump because of the potential political fallout. It also highlights how Cassidy, who no longer has to run for office, could complicate future Senate votes.

The brief argues that the court that suspended the funds in May should uphold that injunction. The senators argued that the fund was an “immediate and dire threat to our constitutional order and the authority of Congress.”

“The existence of the fund is at the heart of Congress’s authority and constitutional order,” the senators said.

Read more CNBC’s political coverage

Lawmakers claim the fund violates “appropriations, appropriations, and appointments” and oversteps Congress’ authority over the federal budget. They also claim it could provide financial compensation to violent rioters who were convicted of storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in an attempt to disrupt the certification of former President Joe Biden’s election victory.

“Intentionally using public funds to compensate these perpetrators in violation of this nation’s Constitution and laws is tantamount to using the machinery of a democratic government to subsidize an attack on its most fundamental processes,” the brief reads.

The fund was established as part of President Trump’s $10 billion settlement of a lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over leaked tax returns. Instead of dropping the case, the Justice Department established a $1.8 billion legal relief fund to compensate victims of what the administration called “the law.”

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified before Congress on Tuesday that the Justice Department has permanently abandoned the weaponization fund and has no intention of pursuing it regardless of the outcome in court. But Trump and his family remain protected from audits and other tax enforcement actions related to tax returns filed before last month’s out-of-court settlement of the lawsuit, pursuant to the original settlement that created the fund.

And Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday that he didn’t know if the case was “dead” or “pending” and said he would have to “ask my lawyer.”

Critics say the Justice Department’s initial statement that it would not move forward with the fund did not make clear whether the department had withdrawn its plans for the fund and is seeking a more permanent solution.

“The court should uphold the injunction against implementation of the anti-weaponization fund and ultimately adjudicate plaintiffs on this issue,” the senators wrote in their brief.

Never miss the most trusted news moments in business news when you choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editor-In-Chief
  • Website

Related Posts

Trump doubts 2026 midterm election results

November 9, 2026

Congress returns to debate on government funding and debt limits on Monday

November 9, 2026

European security threats: cyberattacks, sabotage and riots

November 8, 2026
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

News

Who are the Republicans running for the role of Congressional Minority Leader? | 2026 US Midterm Election News

By Editor-In-ChiefNovember 9, 2026

The US midterm elections reshaped the balance of power in Washington DC and broke Republican…

Why is Nvidia’s Jensen Huang at the center of the US-China spying scandal? | Technology News

November 9, 2026

President Trump says his immigration policy is “too harsh” for voters | 2026 US midterm election news

November 9, 2026
Top Trending

Medium’s new TK app brings AI assistance directly into the writing process

By Editor-In-ChiefNovember 9, 2026

Online publishing platform Medium on Monday launched a new app called TK…

Automattic Debuts Platform to Deploy Vibe Coding Apps in the Changing Internet

By Editor-In-ChiefNovember 9, 2026

WordPress is a key technology and content management system for websites like…

Is Jensen Huang’s job in jeopardy? Jeffrey Sonnenfeld of Yale University estimates it’s “about 50-50.”

By Editor-In-ChiefNovember 8, 2026

Nvidia’s board of directors announced Sunday that it would launch an independent…

Subscribe to News

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Welcome to WhistleBuzz.com (“we,” “our,” or “us”). Your privacy is important to us. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, disclose, and safeguard your information when you visit our website https://whistlebuzz.com/ (the “Site”). Please read this policy carefully to understand our views and practices regarding your personal data and how we will treat it.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact US
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • About US
© 2026 whistlebuzz. Designed by whistlebuzz.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.