At OpenAI’s Dev Day event on Tuesday, the company announced the launch of Dots, a new personal agent assistant powered by GPT-6 Astra. The company describes Dots as “a highly capable always-on agent built to handle it all.”
Unlike Codex and ChatGPT, Dots operates independently of any specific hardware or interface and is intended to pursue user-defined goals continuously in the background with minimal oversight.
“Today, you can start with a primary dot, name it, and create your own,” OpenAI said in an announcement post. “Over time, we envision the team at Dots working together on behalf of our customers.”
Dots will be available on ChatGPT starting Tuesday for Pro and Business Premium users in targeted markets. Users can launch Dots from Codex or ChatGPT.
In its announcement, OpenAI envisions various ways to utilize Dots. In one scenario, software developers deploy dedicated dots to monitor customer feedback and implement bug fixes or requested features as needed. In another example, scientists use dots to rerun analyzes and investigate unexpected results when experimental data becomes available.
Users can message Dots through Slack, Teams, and other organizational platforms, with text message support coming soon.
OpenAI also envisions “expert Dots” with specific responsibilities. You can provision specific identities, credentials, and tools to individual Dots through your existing systems. OpenAI is already working with Microsoft to integrate into the company’s Agent 365 security management.
Much of this functionality was already possible through Codex and similar agent harnesses, but Dots bundles these capabilities into a new package focused on independent agent actions.
The branding also depicts a cheerful, cartoonish persona similar to Meta’s recently released Muse Agent. Dots look like…well, dots. This little floating comic is adapted from OpenAI’s software and is the latest example of a company trying to make AI more approachable.
If you buy through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This does not affect editorial independence.
